Efficacy and safety of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of refractory immune thrombocytopenia: a prospective, single arm, phase I trial.

Patients with refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) frequently encounter substantial bleeding risks and demonstrate limited responsiveness to existing therapies. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) present a promising alternative, capitalizing on their low immunogenicity and potent immunomodulatory effects for treating diverse autoimmune disorders. This prospective phase I trial enrolled eighteen eligible patients to explore the safety and efficacy of UC-MSCs in treating refractory ITP. The research design included administering UC-MSCs at escalating doses of 0.5 × 106 cells/kg, 1.0 × 106 cells/kg, and 2.0 × 106 cells/kg weekly for four consecutive weeks across three cohorts during the dose-escalation phase, followed by a dose of 2.0 × 106 cells/kg weekly for the dose-expansion phase. Adverse events, platelet counts, and changes in peripheral blood immunity were monitored and recorded throughout the administration and follow-up period. Ultimately, 12 (with an addition of three patients in the 2.0 × 106 cells/kg group due to dose-limiting toxicity) and six patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase, respectively. Thirteen patients (13/18, 72.2%) experienced one or more treatment emergent adverse events. Serious adverse events occurred in four patients (4/18, 22.2%), including gastrointestinal hemorrhage (2/4), profuse menstruation (1/4), and acute myocardial infarction (1/4). The response rates were 41.7% in the dose-escalation phase (5/12, two received 1.0 × 106 cells/kg per week, and three received 2.0 × 106 cells/kg per week) and 50.0% (3/6) in the dose-expansion phase. The overall response rate was 44.4% (8/18) among all enrolled patients. To sum up, UC-MSCs are effective and well tolerated in treating refractory ITP (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04014166).

Autoimmune cytopenias in children: When to think of primary immunodeficiency?

Autoimmune cytopenias are defined by autoantibodies' immune destruction of one or more blood elements. Most often it is autoimmune hemolytic anemia or immune thrombocytopenia or both that define Evans syndrome. It may be secondary to infection or to underlying pathology such as systemic autoimmune disease or primary immunodeficiency, especially when it becomes chronic over several years. Primary Immunodeficiencies or inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are no longer defined solely by infections: autoimmunity is part of the clinical features of several of these diseases. It is dominated by autoimmune cytopenias, in particular, immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and autoimmune hemolytic anaemia (AIHA). The challenges for the clinician are the situations where autoimmune cytopenias are chronic, recurrent and/or refractory to the various long-term therapeutic options. Most of these therapies are similar in action and generally consist of non-mediated immune suppression or modulation. In these situations, primary Immunodeficiencies must be diagnosed as soon as possible to allow the initiation of a targeted treatment and to avoid several ineffective therapeutic lines.

Current Understanding of Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Review of Pathogenesis and Treatment Options.

The management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and the prediction of patient response to therapy still represent a significant and constant challenge in hematology. ITP is a heterogeneous disease with an unpredictable evolution. Although the pathogenesis of ITP is currently better known and its etiology has been extensively studied, up to 75% of adult patients with ITP may develop chronicity, which represents a significant burden on patients' quality of life. A major risk of ITP is bleeding, but knowledge on the exact relationship between the degree of thrombocytopenia and bleeding symptoms, especially at a lower platelet count, is lacking. The actual management of ITP is based on immune suppression (corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins), or the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab, or spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitors. A better understanding of the underlying pathology has facilitated the development of a number of new targeted therapies (Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, neonatal Fc receptors, strategies targeting B and plasma cells, strategies targeting T cells, complement inhibitors, and newer TPO-RAs for improving megakaryopoiesis), which seem to be highly effective and well tolerated and result in a significant improvement in patients' quality of life. The disadvantage is that there is a lack of knowledge of the predictive factors of response to treatments, which would help in the development of an optimized treatment algorithm for selected patients.

Should we consider caplacizumab as routine treatment for acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura? An expert perspective on the pros and cons.

INTRODUCTION: Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare and life-threatening disorder. Caplacizumab has been the latest drug incorporated into the initial treatment of acute episodes, allowing for faster platelet recovery and a decrease in refractoriness, exacerbation, thromboembolic events, and mortality. However, caplacizumab is also associated with a bleeding risk and higher treatment costs, which prevent many centers from using it universally. AREAS COVERED: Studies that included iTTP and/or caplacizumab to date were selected for this review using PubMed and MEDLINE platforms. We describe outcomes in the pre-caplacizumab era and after it, highlighting the benefits and risks of its use early in frontline, and also pointing out special situations that require careful management. EXPERT OPINION: It is clear that the availability of caplacizumab has significantly and favorably impacted the management of iTTP patients. Whether this improvement is cost-effective still remains uncertain, and data on long-term sequelae and different healthcare systems will help to clarify this point. In addition, evidence of the bleeding/thrombotic risk of iTTP patients under this drug needs to be better addressed in future studies.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in pregnancy.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in pregnancy is challenging for both mother and fetus. Understanding the pathophysiology, treatments, and risks to the mother and fetus leads to proper management resulting in successful pregnancy and delivery in almost all cases.1 ITP in a pregnant woman has many similarities to ITP not in pregnancy although gestational thrombocytopenia can be confused with ITP. However, recognizing differences is instrumental in avoiding bleeding complications and toxicities of treatment. This Nutshell review focuses on the natural history of ITP in pregnancy, its treatment, and dilemmas.

Difficult-to-treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults: Prevalence and burden. Results from the CARMEN-France registry.

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and the burden of difficult-to-treat primary ITP (pITP), defined by the need for another ITP treatment after romiplostim and eltrombopag. Adult patients were selected in the prospective, real-world CARMEN-France registry up to December 2021. Out of 821 adult patients with pITP, 29 had difficult-to-treat ITP (3.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3%-4.8% in total; 7.6%; 95% CI: 4.9%-10.2% of patients needing ≥2nd line treatment). The 3-year cumulative incidence of bleeding, infection and thrombosis was 100%, 24.1% and 13.8% respectively. The median cumulative duration of hospital stays was 31 days (median follow-up: 30.3 months).

Treatment of critical bleeding events in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Critical bleeding events in adults and children with ITP are medical emergencies; however, evidence-based treatment protocols are lacking. Due to the severe thrombocytopenia, (typically platelet count less than 20 × 109/L), a critical bleed portends a high risk of death or disability. We plan to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for critical bleeding in patients with ITP that will inform evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: Literature searches will be conducted in four electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PubMed. Eligible studies will be randomized controlled trials or observational studies that enrolled patients with ITP describing one or more interventions for the management of critical bleeding. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation will be conducted independently and in duplicate using Covidence and Excel. Outcomes will be pooled for meta-analysis where appropriate or summarized descriptively. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology will be used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Primary outcomes of interest will include frequency of critical bleeds, mortality and bleeding-related mortality, bleeding resolution, platelet count, and disability. DISCUSSION: Evidence-based treatments for critical bleeding in patients with ITP are needed to improve patient outcomes and standardize care in the emergency setting. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42020161206.

How I diagnose and treat thrombocytopenia in geriatric patients.

ABSTRACT: Thrombocytopenia in older individuals is a common but diagnostically challenging condition that has variable clinical impact to those who are affected. Diagnostic approach requires evaluation of the preexisting clinical conditions, detailed review of medications, and assessment for disorders that warrant urgent treatment. In this article, we describe a systematic approach to diagnosis of thrombocytopenia and present a schematic review for management strategies. Three clinical scenarios are presented that are relevant for their prevalence and management challenges in an older adult population. The first scenario addresses primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and reviews different treatment options. The second one addresses complications of thrombocytopenia in management of the myelodysplastic syndrome. The last one reviews diagnostic challenges of drug-induced ITP.

Bortezomib in relapsed/refractory immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: A single-centre retrospective cohort and systematic literature review.

Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare and life-threatening haematological condition. Initial treatment involves plasma exchange (PLEX), corticosteroids, caplacizumab and rituximab. In relapsed and refractory cases despite initial treatments, further immune-modulating therapy includes the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib. Evidence for bortezomib in this setting is limited to case reports and case series. We report our experience and perform a systematic review of the literature. We identified 21 publications with 28 unique patients in addition to our cohort of eight patients treated with bortezomib. The median age of patients was 44 years (IQR: 27-53) and 69% female. They were usually in an initial, refractory presentation of iTTP where they had received PLEX, corticosteroids, rituximab and another line of therapy. After bortezomib administration, 72% of patients had a complete response, with 85% maintaining a durable response without relapse at the last follow-up.

Hematology in the post-COVID era: spotlight on vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia and a conceptual framework (the 4P's) for anti-PF4 diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a life-threatening prothrombotic disorder first identified following the introduction of adenoviral vector vaccines for COVID-19. The condition is characterized by anti-PF4 antibodies and clinically presents with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis often in unusual anatomical sites. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we discuss the clinical presentation, diagnostic testing, and treatment of VITT. We also review VITT-like syndromes that have been described in patients without previous vaccination. We propose a conceptual framework for the mechanism of anti-PF4 diseases that includes sufficiently high levels of PF4, the presence of a Polyanion that can form immune complexes with PF4, a Pro-inflammatory milieu, and an immunological Predisposition - the 4Ps. EXPERT OPINION: Significant progress has been made in understanding the characteristics of the VITT antibody and in testing methods that can confirm that diagnosis. Future work should be directed at understanding long-term outcomes, mechanisms of thrombosis, and individual risk factors for this rare but dangerous immune-thrombotic disease.

Where have all the platelets gone? HIT, DIC, or something else?

Thrombocytopenia in ill children is common; accurately diagnosing the underlying etiology is challenging and essential for appropriate management. Triggers for accelerated consumption of platelets are numerous; common downstream mechanisms of clearance include platelet trapping in microvascular thrombi, phagocytosis, and platelet activation. Thrombocytopenia with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) is frequently due to disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a subgroup of MAHA. Specific TMA syndromes include thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, complement-mediated TMA (CM-TMA), and Shiga toxin-mediated hemolytic uremic syndrome. Isolated thrombocytopenia is characteristic of immune thrombocytopenia; however, concomitant cytopenias are frequent in critically ill patients, making the diagnosis difficult. Immune thrombocytopenia with large vessel thrombosis is a feature of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. In addition, thrombocytopenia is common with macrophage activation, which is characteristic of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. While thrombocytopenia in ill patients can be driven by hypoproliferative processes such as myelosuppression and/or bone marrow failure, this review will focus on consumptive thrombocytopenia due to immune and nonimmune causes.

How to manage ITP with life-threatening bleeding.

While immune thrombocytopenia often presents with mild bleeding manifestations or surprising findings of thrombocytopenia on routine complete blood counts in patients without symptoms, some patients can present with new thrombocytopenia and life-threatening bleeding. Emergent assessment and treatment are needed to prevent substantial morbidity and even mortality. These patients present to the emergency room with bleeding, and hematologists are subsequently consulted. Understanding the approach to making the diagnosis and excluding other life-threatening illnesses is essential, as is rapid initiation of treatment in the bleeding patient even when the diagnosis of immune- mediated thrombocytopenia is tentative. Using a case-based format, we review how to approach and treat patients presenting with new thrombocytopenia and bleeding.

Thrombotic anti-PF4 immune disorders: HIT, VITT, and beyond.

Antibodies against the chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) occur often, but only those that activate platelets induce severe prothrombotic disorders with associated thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the prototypic anti-PF4 disorder, mediated by strong activation of platelets through their FcγIIa (immunoglobulin G [IgG]) receptors (FcγRIIa). Concomitant pancellular activation (monocytes, neutrophils, endothelium) triggers thromboinflammation with a high risk for venous and arterial thrombosis. The classic concept of HIT is that anti-PF4/heparin IgG, recognizing antigen sites on (cationic) PF4 that form in the presence of (anionic) heparin, constitute the heparin-dependent antibodies that cause HIT. Accordingly, HIT is managed by anticoagulation with a nonheparin anticoagulant. In 2021, adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccines triggered the rare adverse effect "vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia" (VITT), also caused by anti-PF4 IgG. VITT is a predominantly heparin-independent platelet-activating disorder that requires both therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and inhibition of FcγRIIa-mediated platelet activation by high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). HIT and VITT antibodies bind to different epitopes on PF4; new immunoassays can differentiate between these distinct HIT-like and VITT-like antibodies. These studies indicate that (1) severe, atypical presentations of HIT ("autoimmune HIT") are associated with both HIT-like (heparin-dependent) and VITT-like (heparin-independent) anti-PF4 antibodies; (2) in some patients with severe acute (and sometimes chronic, recurrent) thrombosis, VITT-like antibodies can be identified independent of proximate heparin exposure or vaccination. We propose to classify anti-PF4 antibodies as type 1 (nonpathogenic, non- platelet activating), type 2 (heparin dependent, platelet activating), and type 3 (heparin independent, platelet activating). A key concept is that type 3 antibodies (autoimmune HIT, VITT) require anticoagulation plus an adjunct treatment, namely high-dose IVIG, to deescalate the severe anti-PF4 IgG-mediated hypercoagulability state.

Fatigue and health-related quality of life in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: a longitudinal assessment in China.

BACKGROUND: There is lacking studies of longitudinally assessment of fatigue and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among Chinese immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) adults. We aimed to evaluate changes in fatigue and HRQoL and identify the associated factors. METHODS: Patients' characteristics, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-F) and the ITP-specific Patient Assessment Questionnaire (ITP-PAQ) scores at admission (T0), at discharge (T1), and three months after discharge (T2) were collected. Linear mixed effects models were used to examine changes over time. RESULTS: We included 175 patients. The mean score of FACIT-F at T0 was 37.2 and increased at T1 (39.0), while then decreased at T2 (34.7). Patients who were single, retired, had persistent ITP, splenomegaly had more severe fatigue, whereas those who had not received any prior treatment and had a bleeding score of 0 at admission had milder fatigue. The mean score of ITP-PAQ was 57.7 at T0, then gradually increased to 60.3 at T1 and 62.8 at T2. Patients with persistent ITP and those who have never received treatment for ITP have better HRQoL. CONCLUSION: ITP adults' fatigue and HRQoL were impaired. Patients' fatigue improved at discharge but worsened at three months after discharge, while HRQoL gradually improved over time.

Platelet dropping, bleeding and new treatment requirements in ITP patients after inactivated COVID-19 vaccination.

Significant decreases in platelet counts and ITP relapses have been documented in ITP patients receiving COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; however, the effect of the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine on ITP patients remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on ITP patients, with a focus on platelet dropping events, bleeding events/scores, and the requirement of a new round of treatment. A total of 118 ITP patients, with 97 chronic ITP and 21 persistent ITP, who received inactivated COVID-19 immunization were investigated retrospectively. Following vaccination (within 1 month), ITP patients reported platelet dropping (31.36 %), new bleeding events (22.88 %), increases in bleeding scores (23.73 %), and new treatment requirements (22.03 %). Among them, persistent ITP patients with disease duration of 3-12 months had higher ratios of the above adverse events (71.43 %, 57.14 %, 61.90 % and 71.43 %, respectively) than chronic ITP patients with duration > 1 year (22.68 %, 15.46 %, 15.46 % and 11.34 %, respectively); patients' disease duration was negatively correlated with platelet dropping events and new treatment requirements. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis also supported the above findings, revealing that persistent ITP patients had 9.40-9.70, 7.24-10.08, and 27.17-28.51 times incidence of having platelet dropping events, new bleeding events, and new treatment requirements after vaccination, respectively, when compared to chronic ITP patients. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that after receiving inactivated COVID-19 vaccines, ITP patients may experience platelet dropping, which may lead to new bleeding events and the requirement of a new round of treatment for ITP recurrence. As a result, platelet level monitoring is crucial for ITP patients during the vaccination, especially those with persistent ITP.

Analysis of clinical characteristics and treatment efficacy in two pediatric cases of ANKRD26-related thrombocytopenia.

ANKRD26-related thrombocytopenia (ANKRD26-RT or THC2, MIM 188 000), an autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia, is unresponsive to immunosuppressive therapy and susceptible to hematological malignancies. A large number of pediatric patients are diagnosed with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) every year; however, thrombocytopenia of genetic origin is often missed. Extensive characterization of ANKRD26-RT will help prevent missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. Furthermore, identification of ANKRD26-RT will help in the formulation of an accurate diagnosis and a treatment plan. In our study, we report cases of two Chinese pediatric patients with ANKRD26-RT and analyze their clinical characteristics, gene mutations, and treatment modalities. Both patients were 1-year-old and presented with mild bleeding (World Health Organization(WHO) score grade 1), different degrees of platelet reduction, normal mean platelet volume, and megakaryocyte maturation impairment not obvious. Genetic tests revealed that both patients had ANKRD26 gene mutations.Patient 1 had a mutation c.-140C>G of the 5' untranslated region (UTR), and patient 2 had a mutation of c.-127A>T of 5'UTR. Both patients were treated with eltrombopag, and the treatment was no response, with no adverse reactions.

What is the background? ANKRD26-RT is an autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia which is unresponsive to immunosuppressive therapy and susceptible to hematological malignancies.It is rare and lacks specific clinical features, making misdiagnosis easy.Some studies report that eltrombopag is safe and effective for short-term treatment of the disease; however, these reports are limited.What we did and summary of findings. We retrospectively studied the clinical manifestations and diagnosis process of ANKRD26-RT and discussed the treatment efficacy of immunosuppressants and eltrombopag for its management.We found two pediatric cases of patients with ANKRD26-RT with varying degrees of thrombocytopenia, mild bleeding, normal mean platelet volume, and megakaryocyte maturation impairment that was not obvious. Immunosuppressant treatment wasunresponsiveor temporarily responsivebut not sustained , and short-term administration of eltrombopag (25 mg/day) was safe, but it did not effectively improve the patients' platelet counts.What is the impact? If patients clinically diagnosed with immune thrombocytopenia do not respond  to immunosuppressive agents, genetic testing should be conducted to exclude hereditary thrombocytopenia, and a normal mean platelet volume should not exclude the possibility of the disease.For patients with ANKRD26-RT, eltrombopag is safe for short-term use;however, 25 mg/day treatment is unresponsive.Ourreport complements data on the diagnosis and management of ANKRD26-RT disease in children.